The Rubric and the Robot_ Complement, Don’t Replace

2026

Open publication workspace · Sign in to read the full PDF.

AI-generated summary

This study compares the effectiveness of teacher, peer, and AI-generated feedback in higher education, revealing that while AI and peer feedback are perceived as fairer, teacher feedback leads to greater improvements in complex academic skills.

* Examines student perceptions of fairness, usefulness, acceptance, and willingness to use feedback from teacher, peer, and LLM sources.
* Analyzes the impact of each feedback source on the quality of student revisions, specifically in content, argumentation, and formal aspects.
* Investigates how feedback literacy and motivational orientation moderate the effects of feedback on both perceptions and achievement.

Tags: AI feedback, peer feedback, teacher feedback, higher education, feedback literacy

Check the original publication for accuracy and context.